I have a fundamental question concerning the origin of humans, I think. I understand that the ancient Sumerian tablets (Cuneiform) say that mankind was genetically engineered–from hominoids–by ancient astronauts called the Anunaki. I believe that the Anunaki were and are planetary angels. The Anunaki–beginning some 200,000 years ago–came to the earth to mine for gold in Havilah or Southern Africa. At first, they undertook the intensive, manual labor themselves. Then, after a while, they came up with a "better" idea: looking around them, they saw hominoids (Neanderthals) wandering around & decided to "tamper" with their DNA, thus creating the first humans. So goes the story.
My question is this: why did the Anunaki make man the way they did? I mean, look at us–in comparison with the apes (gorillas & chimpanzees). We’re a lot weaker, physically. We’re a lot less agile. And I’m sure that we have a lot less lung capacity compared with the hominoids of today: the Sasquatch, Yeti, etc. If we were designed as slaves to take over a job from the Anunaki–that involved heavy, physical exertion–then why did they make us so physically weak. Yes, we are much more intelligent than all the other hominoids and apes, but you would think that physical strength would be more of a prerequisite for this kind of labor: working in a mine.
Your typical Neanderthal was much stronger, physically, than your typical early human (Cro-Magnon). The Anunaki should have taken the Neanderthals–who were probably organized into primitive societies–and increased their intelligence, while simultaneously not tampering with physical abilities. This new hominoid would’ve been the ideal slave for them.
So, it doesn’t make sense that the Anunaki created humans. Unless, there’s something I’m not seeing.